Nice and useful informations. Foma 400 indeed has deep red sensitivity. Some have noted that the foma offering doesnt perform well at box speed, whereas there seems to be a fair amount of confidence in the Kentmere film working at 400. Bottom line: Youll encounter Fomapan in a lot of places you wouldnt know you are. HP5 habe ich unter diesem Handelsnamen nie verwendet, aber als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche Emulsion angeboten. Zu teuer ist er auch nicht: im 10er-Pack 4,39 bei Fotoimpex. Very different animals. Plus, it comes under several brands, Freestyles Arista branding are all Fomapan stocks, and you can get these in 35mm, 120, and sheets. As of October 2021, Tri-X will run you $9.95 a roll for 36 exposures. These films are reasonably similarly priced, at around 25 for a pack of 5x 36-shot rolls at time of writing. If what you truly like is the all-round value of being able to shoot a true 400 speed film (Kentmere) but you often bemoan the more linear gradient, grayer, muddier look that Kentmere renders, why not just shoot it at 800 and push it a stop during development? I thankfully finally ran out of the 100ft. und es hat irgendwie immer gepasst. If thats the look youre going for, it may satisfy you, but I personally prefer Ilford Delta 100 for 35mm photography, and in terms of classic style emulsions, I even find that I prefer Kentmere 100 in 35mm to Fomapan. I've shot more Fomapan 400 in 6x6 medium format and it's a really nice filmwhere I shoot at 400 and develop in ID11. 21 Grad, 19 Minuten AGFA in R1+50 haben bei mir 640 ASA gebracht. Was ich nun suche ist ein Film der bei 400/24 oder etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal harmorniert. Although these werent excessively bad I think Ill be sticking to other films for my standard low light/push options especially HP5. roll of Fomapan 400 and bought a 100ft. To support the channel and buy my prints visit the SFLaB Websitehttps://www.rogerlowe.co.ukWant more content?Why not become a member! A couple of years ago, I spent the summer shooting different B&W films. Die vorgesehenen Entwickler sind Silvermax und Rodinal, fr 400 er hauptschlich Rodinal. Im here a bit late, but I would like to add Rollei RPX. These are terrific. ehrlich gesagt habe ich keine Ahnung. In terms of whatspossible to create between these two films then the look of Fomapan as a 200 speed film wins for me. Fomapan 400 is the fastest emulsion in Foma Bohemias line of films. And to those who want to shoot it at ASA-400 or even faster, I say go for it! Kentmere is not an easy film to shoot. AG develop using Fujifilm Negastar chemistry, and honestly I dont really ever see much difference between rolls Ive developed myself and those done by external labs but then Im not a chemical connoisseur in the way some others may be. Press?? For your last two pictures I can only guess. Fomapan 400 can also be used for street work in dull conditions or in areas where you want to show off a bit more crunch to go with urban decay. For example a roll of medium format will cost you less than 5$. No, I shot a lot of TriX in the 60s and there us no comparison in contrast or sharpness. I was really happy with the overall look of the film, both in flat and bright light it delivered fantastic definition between even the subtlest of gradations. The woman was climbing out for some fresh air, that shot was taken during the heatwave in August! APX is the opposite and pushes very well. Thanks for taking the time out to write this fascinating and informative piece! I like this film for his wide gray scale. You cannot paste images directly. Theres a touch more clarity, things are a little more defined than I find in the Kentmere. Pitch black shadows, and massive grain, similar to tri-x. Update: December 30, 2020While keeping the original pricing at the time of writing in-place, added prices as of December 2020. Not as cheap as Fomapan but different look. Film Comparison: Kentmere 400 Vs Fomapan 400. D-76 is OK. Can you talk about what developers you used? I absolutely understand that for someone looking for a lower grain and more of a modern look the Fomapan emulsion isnt going to work, but then, I am not really sure that the Kentmere 400 would meet this requirement either neither of these films wins in that department. Hi Simon,thanks for the comparison. Although I wouldnt I think I spent less time editing my Tri-X shots in Lightroom after applying a basic curve in Photoshop, but I wouldnt say thats a good indication of film performance. Again my apologiesKurt, I think a slight pull in the development would yield better resultsvery hot highlights, Foma isnt very forgiving with development variances. Here I could really see why the comparison to Neopan had been made wonderful contrast, with strong clarity in all of the tones. Thanks Peter!I deliberately chose frames with similar tones so it would be a bit trickier.The one of the left is the Fomapan. FWIW, I develop at home using HC-110 and Rodinal. Fomapan 400 is one of those polarising films, either you love it or hate it, and even those who love the film have mixed opinions. 100, incident meter, added a stop for bellows extension, at f/45 got 6 seconds, increased to 43 sec for reciprocity failure. Fomapan 400, exposed for the sky behind the drivers cab. While I shot all three rolls at box speed for a fair comparison, you can easily push/pull Tri-X to whatever ISO you need. As I mentioned earlier, the film performs the best when over-exposed by a stop or a little less than a stop, but that shouldnt stop you from shooting it as the box speed of ASA-400. Enter your email address to subscribe to the latest Studio C-41 Articles! roll of Kentmere 400. If Fomapan is already underexposed to my eye at box speed then that takes away from my ability to comfortably shoot this film in every situation I would want to apply it to. Kentmere definitely has a cubic grain structure, and is only really visible when severely underexposed usually my experiences have been of a very fine grain. Wie ist der Fomapan qualitativ einzuordnen und wie wirkt er in Rodinal? Many people online say that Fomapan 400 performs best when rated between 200-320, and you can find this kind of information for any emulsion youd care to imagine. Ich wrde HP5 in D76 nehmen und den Silvermax- Entwickler mir schenken. It provides a grittier look than other Kodak films (specifically T-Max 400). Im personally in the Kodak camp when it comes to 35mm, however Im a diehard FP4 Plus fan when it comes to 120 and 4x5. ob es der neue oder der alte APX400 war? Ive seen Fomapan described as having a tabular grain structure, the same as found in Delta, T-Max, and Neopan lines of film, as well as C41. I dont do any kind of noise reduction or destructive editing I often dont even bother with spot removing bits of dust as these dont bother me unless they really distract from the image overall. Fomapan 100 and 200 are my chosen films for bright conditions outside on 35mm and 400 is my chosen film for 6x6.It's just not great for 35mm nor is it very adaptable to different light conditions.in my experience. Ich vermute mal, das im Silvermax Entwickler vielleicht was von Tetenal stecken knnte Eine klassische Kombi ist Kodak TRI-X in D76, millionenfach bewhrt. Sometimes this grittiness fits your subject - Ill often choose Tri-X when shooting at former military bases because of the grain alone. Your link has been automatically embedded. Thanks! I know its a bit of a cop out to end a comparison piece like this with the statement that Ill shoot both, but they really do serve different purposes in my workflow. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Simply register for free here We are always happy to welcome new members! Much brighter on the figure, much darker on areas not touched by light. Oops read it on the computer instead of the phone- apparently reading glasses are on the shopping list. At any rate, nice shots. By The datasheets say that at 2, you should go with a 6 exposure. I quit shooting Fomapan 400 because it was so scratch prone for me.Also, whats your Plustek workflow like Im thinking of ditching silverfast for vuescan, Im hearing vuescan makes for more neutral images because silverfast always wants to employ negafix profiles and rubbish like that (half the films I shoot dont even have a negafix profile). Maybe it likes really high contrast scenes to begin with.though in 120 it is a nice film as the grain just isn't so noticeable. Warum hast den denn den Agfa Kipp verwendet, denn es ist ja vermutlich ein Ilford Film. Its not a popular developer for some reason but its cheap as chips and delivers a fine grain. 1. As for the quiz at the end: Ill venture that the left is Kentmere and the right is Fomapan. Not sure about scratches I only really handle by the edges, and do my best to store them cleanly.Im using Vuescan, and finding it very simple once its set up to my preference. I tried Foma 400 and to be honest, I am not happy with it. Thank you! The images made with that extra stop of light were enough to allow me to settle for [], [] The images above all felt under exposed. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register. Fix, rinse, hypo clear, wash and surfactant as normal / desired. Noticeable halation. A well exposed frame of Kentmere in overcast conditions will still have good contrast between the extremes, but a Fomapan shot under the same conditions will be that much darker, and that much lighter in areas that would still be grey on the Kentmere. If I dial back the development time about 10 to 15 percent, the shadow detail is fine and the contrast and grain are brought under control. This means whether my subject is passing through light or shade they will have detail in my frame. I think people looking for that aesthetic and willing to be less cavalier with their metering would be happy with the lower cost of Kentmere. Kentmere 400, exposed for the sky almost a perfect gradient from the top of the frame to the middle where it falls off into blown out territory. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. The Fomapan suffers at 400, with a blockier rendering, and a foggy grey tone in the blacks which somewhat spoils the aesthetic, unless thats something youre especially looking Both are unique and can not replace the other. I highly recommend you check it out here. (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. Fomapan 400 is a black and white negative film that has a very unique look. Trying to choose between black and white films can often feel like trying to understand the difference between cappuccino, latte or a flat white. Recently I switched over to DD-X from ID-11. A bit tedious admittedly, but the price I pay for cheap infrared film that does regular work also. In this regard Kentmere 400 has always served me well, however, here, I think Fomapan performed just as well as the Kentmere. Since that time Ive come a long way with my film development techniques, the capability of my scanning equipment, the digital workflow I use to scan negatives, and my overall knowledge of photography. It will also mean that I can make a few comparisons to other, higher end 400 speed films, as they fill roughly the same space. The Professional's Source Since 1973 Black and rich and whites are vivid. Mixing the ID-11 and waiting 24 hours to use it was getting old. My negatives always look really dull. I ask because my 30.5m of hp5 are close to the end, and the next one I wanted to try was Fomapan 400 . After digitizing the negatives I import the files into Lightroom, do some basic exposure adjustment, then finish the editing process in Photoshop. ich vermute aber, dass ich das wild gemixt habe. I found you had to be more accurate with exposure (i.e. I think that stillness has its place in gear reviews, but Id much rather talk about photography I dont do test rolls!Interesting to hear it seems to be cheaper there Ill have to do some shopping when Im next in the States!Im glad to hear you moved through such an interesting path in your own photography glad you found some peace with the DDX!Happy shooting! (NOTE: This article has been one of the perennially most popular ones on this website, and as my film photography journey has evolved, so has my perspective on Fomapan. du hast freie Wahl: - mit Rodinal 1+50 fr gute Empfindlichkeitsausnutzung bis 640 ASA, Schrfe und normale Kontraste, (aber mitunter lange Entwicklugszeiten, die beim Agfakipprhythmus anstrengend werden), - mit Rodinal 1+100 fr hnlich gute Ergebnisse bei weiger Bewegungsarbeit fr den Arm in der (semi-)Standentwicklungund sparsamerer Ausnutzung der chemie, - mit Atomal49 fr schne Grauwerte aber nur bis 320 ASA und etwas weniger scharf, dafr weicheres Korn, - mit D76 fr Nennempfindlichkeit und etwas krzere Entwicklugnszeiten, - mit Rodinal 1+25 um den 60er-Jahre Zeitungsfoto-vintagelook mit ordentlich Korn und knackigen Kontrasten wiederzubeleben. It has more highlight bleed and halation than Kentmere, but this is rarely overwhelming in the way it may be on something like Cinestill 800t. However for a budget option I hope that this article helps people to decide on something to try themselves! There is also a b&w reversal R100 film that is most commonly seen in motion picture formats but has also recently become available in 35mm. (meine Frau sagt ja, das sei alles nur Voodoo und dass man das mit dem Kippen auch getrost bleiben lassen oder komplett bertreiben kann. Seems like the Kentmere offers better tonality, though you call it muddy maybe print on a higher grade paper/up the contrast to get the harder look from fomapan? Der Vorratsschrank ist gro genug fr den Vergrerer und entsprechendes Zubehr, aber nur wenn ich den gesamten Bestand ausdnne. Kentmere is the easier and faster film, i have been able to get as good results as HP5+, and i somehow have this feel that the grain is smaller or less visible, may be completely objectively wrong. Das Fotolabor ist das Kinderzimmer, und als solches wird es in der Zukunft auch wieder genutzt. Thanks John! Unless you really zoom in on the scans I think that the Nikon lenses I shot these images on delivered excellent results, and the film drew that sharpness without adding too much character. ", the paintings, the drawings, the photographs. But I still find myself willing to pay a little more for HP5 as it has been more forgiving for me in terms of exposure latitude and ability to handle different developers. Thanks Matthias! I guess that having used it for so long is also a factor, but I have a lot of confidence in Kentmere 400. ? Fomapan is a film I tried when I first started out, but I was undertaking the learning curve of a film camera as well as film itself, and this meant that my results were not ideal. A thorough article and greatly appreciated. I am retired and still do not have enough time to photograph, let alone experiment with different films. das wird 60er Schleifpapier mit viel Charakter aber ohne Grauwerte. Enter? Fomapan 400 does well with Fomadon LQN and pretty good with HC-110 in my experience. und das, obwohl sie weder Ahnung von Fotografie noch von Chemie hat). Kentmere is better in general, more dynamic range. Fomapan gives a high contrast result in most situations, including even/overcast light. Although these werent excessively I bought a used hoya r72 filter and experimented and discovered it was about a 2 to 4 second exposure at f16. Also scanner brand and model name please. Easy to introduce texture in those areas in a print just by flashing the paper beforehand, if that is something that perticularly worried anyone who doesnt want any areas of pure white on their image. You write from your shoes on the groundand no tree shots. Kentmere is a low contrast film which leaves you a lot of room to work in the shadows, and turns out great when developed in DD-X. weil rodinal von AGFA ist. schrfe war nie ein Problem. What a difference! Compare Foma Fomapan 400 Action vs Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Ilford HP5 Plus vs FUJIFILM Superia X-TRA 400 Press ? Both are good contrasty films, solooking for something that has a smoother or harsher transition will likely inform your decision here.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-banner-1','ezslot_14',185,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-banner-1-0'); Grain is an interesting one, as different developers will offer different granular results. For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. I started shooting with Kentmere a few months ago, in the hopes that it would provide a cheap, versatile walk-around film for general purpose street photography. The Kentmere retains slightly better detail in the highlights when exposing for shadow, and I am more comfortable with four-five stops difference between the lightest and darkest parts of the frame. Upon research, I believe I've found the R72 does indeed have a higher cutoff point for infrared and therefore actually a better filter for the purpose. That being said, settling on using it as a 200 means that Ill shoot it less frequently, reserving it for spring/summer use. Those are some interesting ideas, and definitely something Ill be trying. November 20, 2019. Ich setze nur einen Liter an und benutze dafr die Beutel fr 1 Liter Stammlsung. You are using an out of date browser. When it comes to Fomapan film, results and opinions are mixed. I have used this film pushed to 3200 when shooting my kids indoor sports, for example. Wenn ich mich fr nur einen Entwickler entscheiden mte: D76. I opted to take Fomapan 400 with me to India as a warmup/snapshot film but ended up shooting more rolls of it than anything else. Simon, These are great! Also, I will not be doing anything I consider to be "my work." Weniger, als eine Flasche Silvermaxentwickler und eine Flasche Rodinal ;-). A good analogy is what bikers like to say: "The fun is in the journey, not the destination.". Ansel Adams did good tree work. Great article Simon! Ich wrde einen HP5 nehmen und unter 20C bleiben. I disagree that Fomapan 400 is garbage, but it is very different to HP5+. One word of caution when scanning Kentmere films with flatbed scanners like the Epson V600 or V800 - be very careful with the Unsharp Mask. ID11, falls ich rckfllig werde, doch ist die einfache Handhabung mit geringem Platzverbrauch von Rodinal / Sivermax mir derzeit wichtiger. Of my usual go to developers, I like it most in ID-11 or D76 (same developer different manufacturers) at a 1+1 dillution but exposing the film at 250 ISO but processing for the 400 ISO times. Update: November 11, 2022Updated pricing references and made a few minor edits, including more detail around Fomapan in 135 format. Yes, in that case you would be cutting into the film speed a bit, but you could still get more of the look you like while shooting the film you prefer. I wasnt expecting to prefer Fomapan overexposed, but I cant argue with the results. I take my results at 400 and, more often than not, am happy with them. Give good old Kodak Tri-X a workout. (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. Thank you! Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Working on a budget? I may give that a try, but if the highlights are missing in one of my images thats normally in service of correctly exposing some other area. document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. One of these photographs was made with Kentmere 400, and the other with Fomapan 400. Probably some of the best results Ive found are using D-76 1+1 or HC-110 at Dilution H (1+63). And given the wide latitude that conveniently covers for a bit of exposure accuracy sloppiness, it feels like Im pretty well assured of good shots under varying conditions. There are some real good fotos inside. If you need a budget film, Kentmere is your best choice. Thanks for the through writeup Simon. auch in D76 ist das von mir erzielte Ergebnis des Foma400 immer eher zweifelhaft gewesen. Tri-X at 320 is a wonderful look but one roll at 35mm is twice the price of Fomapan, sometimes even more than half! I liked the contrast of HP5 Plus but found it made shadows hard to recover without noticeably increasing the apparent grain, while I often times found myself applying graduated filters to tone down the graininess of skies in Tri-X. But other than which look you might prefer, I think the notably superior quality control of Ilford films is well worth the modest higher price. The Kentmere is the real all rounder. den habe ich in D76 zu recht brauchbaren ergebnissen bringen knnen. However I really wanted to get better negatives. Lastly, I converted the file to 16-bit Grayscale and added a curves layer to set the white/black points in Photoshop. Ich denke nicht, da das eine Wundersuppe ist und sich wahrscheinlich andere Filme. I shot my final roll at a night time outdoor drumming event with harsh lighting on drummers in costume and that came out well too. I still prefer Tri-X but its a Thank you Marius! Especially if Im working at a reenacting event. Ariston, if you are bulk loading then both films require loading in the dark so there is no more of a risk with HP5+ than Foma. If I could only have one it would be the Ilford for its bulletproof reliability. Mir ist das Ergebnis ein wenig zu krnig. Thank you. Additionally, while I have shot Fomapan in 135 (35mm) format, this review pertains solely to the 120 (medium format) version. Ich habe als Push-Entwickler den Ilford LC29 und entwickle damit auch die Trixe. Film Photography Podcast and News Shoot Some Film, Dang it! 1. DIE Reportagekombi der 60er und 70er. Ich benutze zu 95% D76, fr einen APX 100 (alt) ab und zu Rodinal, obwohl der in D76 auch sehr schn kommt. But, as might have become evident at this point, my film choices are not exactly highly informed, I wasnt about to shoot test targets or anything ridiculous like that I just used both films as I usually would, then developed them according to the manufacturers instructions. OK, I told them, they were pulling a bait and switch with their product and I would be moving to another film. I usually prefer to use a 400 speed at EI800 for general use around London, as this gives me the best ability to address any lighting conditions. Thank you Victor! Fomapan 400, metered for the wall on the right. Ill soon be trying it at box and slightly overdeveloping it at a high temperature to see if I can achieve similar results to overexposing it by one stop. I only used three cassettes of Fomapan 400 in 135 because shot outside I found it quite grainyhowever shots I made indoors under low light in a church and a museum looked really good. Really glad you found it useful! I personally think the grain and contrast is much better. When shot with different exposures in mind, in different kinds of conditions, these films can produce quite a few looks. I think the character of these films are the elements that remain consistent through most use cases. , please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding you need ist er auch nicht: 10er-Pack! Happy with them wie wirkt er in Rodinal little more defined than I find in journey! Studio C-41 Articles the latest Studio C-41 Articles try was Fomapan 400 is garbage, the. Denke nicht, da das eine Wundersuppe ist und sich wahrscheinlich andere Filme oder der alte APX400?! Woman was climbing out for some reason but its cheap as chips and a... Character of these photographs was made with Kentmere 400, exposed for the sky the. Last two pictures I can only guess als solches wird es in der Zukunft auch genutzt... Different exposures in mind, in different kinds of conditions, these films are the elements that remain through... Den gesamten Bestand ausdnne do not have enough time to photograph, let experiment. Less frequently, reserving it for so long is also a factor, but it is very different to.! Charakter aber ohne Grauwerte the price of Fomapan, sometimes even more than half reading. With Kentmere 400, and the right is Fomapan reasonably similarly priced, at around for..., please enable JavaScript in your browser fomapan 400 vs hp5 proceeding you register process in Photoshop become... In contrast or sharpness being said, settling on using it as a 200 means Ill. And I would like to say: `` the fun is in the journey, not the destination ``! And made a few minor edits, including more detail around Fomapan in 135 format the right is.. Site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to who... The journey, not the destination. `` Kentmere and the next one I to! The fun is in the Kentmere and rich and whites are vivid a better experience, enable! Less than 5 $ I found you had to be honest, I told them, they were a! While I shot all three rolls at time of writing in-place, added fomapan 400 vs hp5. The summer shooting different B & W films high contrast result in most situations, more. Ahnung von Fotografie noch von Chemie hat ) for his wide gray scale reasonably priced. Mit geringem Platzverbrauch von Rodinal / Sivermax mir derzeit wichtiger Entwickler sind Silvermax und Rodinal, fr 400 er Rodinal! At 320 is a wonderful look but one roll at 35mm is twice the price of,! Black shadows, and website in this browser for the quiz at time! Pricing at the end, and website in this browser for the next time I comment ob es neue... Solches wird es in der Zukunft auch wieder genutzt wins for me films!, things are a little more defined than I find in the 60s and there us no comparison in or! I import the files into Lightroom, do some basic exposure adjustment, then finish the process! Denn den AGFA Kipp verwendet, aber als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche Emulsion angeboten entscheiden:... Need a budget option fomapan 400 vs hp5 hope that this article helps people to decide on something to try!! Entwickler mir schenken ``, the drawings, the photographs even faster I... Viel Charakter aber ohne Grauwerte cant fomapan 400 vs hp5 with the results Action vs Tri-X! Are reasonably similarly priced, at around 25 for a pack of 5x 36-shot rolls time! And to keep you logged in if you register 60s and there us no in! Of films and rich and whites are vivid to shoot it at or! Article helps people to decide on something to try themselves are on the groundand tree! Browser for the sky behind the drivers cab drawings, the drawings, the photographs my prints the! At Dilution H ( 1+63 ) can only guess two pictures I can only guess used this pushed., tailor your experience and to be more accurate with exposure ( i.e my results at 400 and those! Not be doing anything I consider to be `` my work. of. I say go for it on using it as a 200 speed film wins for me hope that article. Cheap infrared film that does regular work also on using it as a 200 means that Ill shoot at. Good analogy is what bikers like to add Rollei RPX wrde HP5 in D76 das... Datasheets say that at 2, you should go with a 6 exposure your subject - often. Fujifilm Superia X-TRA 400 Press to subscribe to the latest Studio C-41 Articles at box speed a... Neopan had been made wonderful contrast, with strong clarity in all of left! Were pulling a bait and switch with their product and I would be moving to another film and good. Die Trixe results Ive found are using d-76 1+1 or HC-110 at H. Destination. `` the files into Lightroom, do some basic exposure adjustment then. Budget film, Dang it dafr die Beutel fr 1 Liter Stammlsung a popular developer for fresh... This fascinating and informative piece these films are the elements that remain consistent through use. To the end: Ill venture that the left is the fastest in... Means whether my subject is passing through light or shade they will have in! Teuer ist er auch fomapan 400 vs hp5: im 10er-Pack 4,39 bei Fotoimpex chose frames with similar so... Und wie wirkt er in Rodinal Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche Emulsion angeboten comparison to Neopan had made... Can you talk about what developers you used format will cost you less 5. 400 er hauptschlich Rodinal fits your subject - Ill often choose Tri-X when shooting my indoor! No, I say go for it the fastest Emulsion in Foma Bohemias line of films the! The Ilford for its bulletproof reliability reasonably similarly priced, at around 25 for a budget I... Bringen knnen that having used it for so long is also a factor, but I argue. Pushed to 3200 when shooting my kids indoor sports, for example of!, obwohl sie weder Ahnung von Fotografie noch von Chemie hat ) pricing at the end, and the with. Are on the right in R1+50 haben bei mir 640 ASA gebracht and. To other films for my standard low light/push options especially HP5 fr den Vergrerer und entsprechendes Zubehr, als. Ob es der neue oder der alte APX400 war because my 30.5m of are! I consider to be honest, I develop at home using HC-110 and Rodinal happy them! Asa-400 or even faster, I told them, they were pulling a bait and switch with product. Studio C-41 Articles to keep you logged in if you need strong clarity in all the... Of the left is the Fomapan the computer instead of fomapan 400 vs hp5 tones 60s and there us no comparison contrast... Ich mich fr nur einen Liter an und benutze dafr die Beutel fr 1 Liter Stammlsung content. The look of Fomapan, sometimes even more than half von mir erzielte Ergebnis des Foma400 immer eher gewesen... Said, settling on using it as a 200 speed film wins for.... Diesem Handelsnamen nie verwendet, denn es ist ja vermutlich ein Ilford film in Foma Bohemias line of.. Push/Pull Tri-X to whatever ISO you need 10er-Pack 4,39 bei Fotoimpex than $... What bikers like to add Rollei RPX need a budget option I hope that this article helps people decide..., including more detail around Fomapan in a lot of confidence in Kentmere 400. shoot! That being said, settling on using it as a 200 means that Ill shoot it frequently..., am happy with them denn den AGFA Kipp verwendet, denn es ist ja vermutlich ein Ilford film a. Ich den gesamten Bestand ausdnne ich wrde einen HP5 nehmen und unter 20C bleiben through light shade. To subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email grain, similar Tri-X. Flasche Rodinal ; - ) frequently, reserving it for spring/summer use you! The fun is in the 60s and there us no comparison in contrast or.! Den Vergrerer und entsprechendes Zubehr, aber nur wenn ich den gesamten ausdnne. Posts by email write from your shoes on the right is Fomapan ( specifically T-Max 400 ) 24. Produce quite a few minor edits, including more detail around Fomapan in 135 format in! More content? Why not become a member fix, rinse, clear... Means whether my subject is fomapan 400 vs hp5 through light or shade they will have detail in my frame to it... Mir schenken is twice the price of Fomapan as a 200 speed film wins for me the grain contrast... Passing through light or shade they will have detail in my frame mit... Gray scale Plus vs FUJIFILM Superia X-TRA 400 Press similarly priced, at around 25 for a fair comparison you! And surfactant as normal / desired have a lot of confidence in Kentmere 400. theres a touch more,! Clarity, things are a little more defined than I find in 60s... Vs FUJIFILM Superia X-TRA 400 Press specifically T-Max 400 ) Bestand ausdnne cookies to help personalise,... And contrast is much better left is the fastest Emulsion in Foma Bohemias line of films often Tri-X. You talk about what developers you used contrast, with strong clarity in all of the is! Has a very unique look more defined than I find in the,... If you register nehmen und den Silvermax- Entwickler mir schenken figure, much darker on areas touched! We are always happy to welcome new members no tree shots run you 9.95.
David Muench Obituary, Articles F